Sunday, August 20, 2006
United Democratic Nations - shot down he-he
Finally, A deletion debate record….
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Democratic Nations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion Jump to: navigation, search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 20:43, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit]
United Democratic Nations
Delete. This organization does not exist, and external links are to the author's personal pages. Stephen Gilbert 16:51, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Fiction. Slowmover 17:02, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom, WP:NFT. [1]. PJM 17:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete as fiction, WP:NFT. --Kinu t/c 17:44, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete a pipe-dream of some nut who thinks his organization is going to replace the UN. --djrobgordon 18:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete as net.kookery. --BWD (talk) 19:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete WP is not for things made up in school one day. (aeropagitica) 21:28, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete as WP:NFT per Mr. Pagitica. Kuru talk 02:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
==================================== Author Reply:
**Delete a pipe-dream of some nut who thinks his organization is going to replace the UN. --djrobgordon 18:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC) **
United Democratic Nations is merely a proposed title name for a possible alternate entity for the presently troubled United Nations. Ambassador Bolten himself suggested the need for same. http://tinyurl.com/psdhw
DirobGordon imagines that suggestion of this name, UDN, somehow makes me :
[1] **some nut **
[2] ** an organization owner **
[3] ** someone who hopes to replace the UN **
One has to wonder about the emotional maturity of persons wielding destructive power at WP.
Does this mean that any constructive or original proposal is automatically destroyed?
Guess I should be flattered that someone could think I owned an organization called United Democratic Nations and that my personal organization could replace the UN. = TG
Another fun project. Nothing like notoriety.
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Democratic Nations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion Jump to: navigation, search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 20:43, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit]
United Democratic Nations
Delete. This organization does not exist, and external links are to the author's personal pages. Stephen Gilbert 16:51, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Fiction. Slowmover 17:02, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom, WP:NFT. [1]. PJM 17:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete as fiction, WP:NFT. --Kinu t/c 17:44, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete a pipe-dream of some nut who thinks his organization is going to replace the UN. --djrobgordon 18:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete as net.kookery. --BWD (talk) 19:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete WP is not for things made up in school one day. (aeropagitica) 21:28, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete as WP:NFT per Mr. Pagitica. Kuru talk 02:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
==================================== Author Reply:
**Delete a pipe-dream of some nut who thinks his organization is going to replace the UN. --djrobgordon 18:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC) **
United Democratic Nations is merely a proposed title name for a possible alternate entity for the presently troubled United Nations. Ambassador Bolten himself suggested the need for same. http://tinyurl.com/psdhw
DirobGordon imagines that suggestion of this name, UDN, somehow makes me :
[1] **some nut **
[2] ** an organization owner **
[3] ** someone who hopes to replace the UN **
One has to wonder about the emotional maturity of persons wielding destructive power at WP.
Does this mean that any constructive or original proposal is automatically destroyed?
Guess I should be flattered that someone could think I owned an organization called United Democratic Nations and that my personal organization could replace the UN. = TG
Another fun project. Nothing like notoriety.
